Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 6 results ...

Chang, Y, Wilkinson, S, Seville, E and Potangaroa, R (2010) Resourcing for a resilient post-disaster reconstruction environment. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 1(01), 65–83.

Haigh, R and Amaratunga, D (2010) An integrative review of the built environment discipline's role in the development of society's resilience to disasters. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 1(01), 11–24.

Hayles, C S (2010) An examination of decision making in post disaster housing reconstruction. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 1(01), 103–22.

McEntire, D, Crocker, C G and Peters, E (2010) Addressing vulnerability through an integrated approach. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 1(01), 50–64.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: disasters; modelling; risk management
  • ISBN/ISSN: 1759-5908
  • URL: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/17595901011026472
  • Abstract:
    Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to review current theoretical approaches in disaster studies and put forward a model of vulnerability that incorporates physical science, engineering, and social science research. Design/methodology/approach: A comprehensive model of vulnerability is proposed, which includes both liabilities and capabilities from the physical and social environments. The model is related to risk, susceptibility, resistance, and resilience to vulnerability and disasters. Findings: This review assesses current concepts as guides for disaster management and suggests that a more complete view of vulnerability is more apt to generate inclusive and integrated disaster policies. Research limitations/implications: Since this model is relatively new, its applicability needs to be examined further in terms of the phases of disasters and the many stakeholders involved in emergency management. Practical implications: The holistic model of vulnerability in this paper may help emergency managers better understand disasters and devise relevant policies to counter them. The paper underscores the importance of broad and integrated methods for dealing with socially constructed disasters. It is related to environmental, infrastructure, economic, political, cultural, and other variables. Originality/value: This paper is unique in that it presents four viewpoints of vulnerability and because it applies the proposed model to many different types of disasters

Oh, E H, Deshmukh, A and Hastak, M (2010) Disaster impact analysis based on inter-relationship of critical infrastructure and associated industries: a winter flood disaster event. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 1(01), 24–49.

Pourezzat, A A, Nejati, M and Mollaee, A (2010) Dataflow model for managing urban disasters: the experience of Bam earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 1(01), 84–102.